Skip to article
MATRIXLINK crypto arbitrage analytics Contact us

Transparent analysis

How MatrixLink evaluates arbitrage opportunities

The method separates fast price-gap discovery from deeper checks of liquidity and route costs. Its output is an estimate, not a promise of execution.

A two-stage market review

The first pass compares available tickers and creates candidates. The second requests order books or DEX quotes for a working size and recalculates the route.

  • market-data age checks;
  • aggregation across order-book levels;
  • known route-cost deductions;
  • network, contract, and transfer-availability filters.

What the model cannot know

The estimate cannot predict future prices, exact queue priority, account-specific limits, or deposit timing. Venue APIs also differ in fee and network-status coverage.

Estimated net = gross difference − trading fees − withdrawal − gas − swap fee − slippage

Updated: 2026-07-18

Frequently asked questions

Why use two stages?

Tickers provide broad, fast coverage; depth is requested for fewer candidates where trade-size validation matters.

Is estimated net profit an exact amount?

No. It reflects available data at a point in time; fills, costs, and market prices can differ.

Evaluate routes from data, not promises

Open MatrixLink, set a working size, and review order-book depth, fees, transfer route, and quote freshness.